What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

Seven Mindblowing Space Photos Taken This Month - PetaPixel

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

A misplaced MRI found a tumor on her spine. Doctors removed it through her eye in a first-of-its-kind surgery. - CBS News

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

Inside Mark Zuckerberg’s AI hiring spree - The Verge

+ for

in structures, such as:

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

The AI-generated ad that aired during the NBA finals took $2,000 and 2 days to make - Mashable

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

a b i 1 x []